Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1995.99 • TRPI TI 90.1995.99 AI generated

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge Regarding Master Plan Amendment

Case Number 90.1995.99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal against a State Council resolution that approved an amendment to the Master Plan concerning the inventory of buildings located outside the buildable zones of a municipality. The Territorial Planning Court, having noted that the appellant's representative declared the withdrawal of the challenge via a letter dated September 3, 1998, concluded that the case had become moot and therefore ordered the appeal to be struck from the rolls without imposing any fees or expenses.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge Regarding Master Plan Amendment: The Territorial Planning Court, having noted that the appellant's representative declared the withdrawal of the challenge via a letter dated September 3, 1998, concluded that the case had become moot and therefore ordered the appeal to be struck from the rolls without imposing any fees or expenses.

Keywords

AI generated
standing against building permit revision of spatial plan withdrawal of petition standing to appeal right of removal procedural objections Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1996.102
Appeal Struck After Withdrawal of Challenge to Municipal Master Plan
90.2001.29
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Master Plan Amendment
90.1998.150
Appeal of Master Plan Resolution Withdrawn
90.2003.50
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Master Plan Revision
90.2000.40
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Municipal Master Plan Revision

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
1.

This order specifies that the appeal is struck from the rolls because it became moot due to withdrawal by the appellant.

2.

This order states that no fees or costs are to be levied, which is a procedural/cost ruling.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.95.00099 · Lugano 7 settembre 1998 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 30 giugno 1995 di

CE __________ -__________ -__________, __________, rappr. da: __________ __________, __________ __________, contro

la risoluzione __________marzo 1995 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva la variante di Piano Regolatore concernente l'inventario degli edifici situati fuori dalle zone edificabili del comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 15 novembre 1995 del Consiglio di Stato e 31 luglio 1995 del Comune di Aurigeno;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 3 settembre 1998 il rappresentante della ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - _________ _________, _________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario