Legislator Case Law & Legislation
90.1995.87 • TRPI TI 90.1995.87 AI generated

Appeal Against Municipal Master Plan Amendments Withdrawn

Case Number 90.1995.87
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court was presented with an appeal challenging the resolution of the State Council that approved several amendments to the master plan of a municipality. However, at the hearing, the representative for the appellant formally withdrew the appeal, leading the Territorial Planning Court to declare that the case was rendered without object, and consequently ordered the appeal to be struck from the records, with no court fees or expenses to be levied.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese; Appeal Against Municipal Master Plan Amendments Withdrawn: However, at the hearing, the representative for the appellant formally withdrew the appeal, leading the Territorial Planning Court to declare that the case was rendered without object, and consequently ordered the appeal to be struck from the records, with no court fees or expenses to be levied.

Keywords

AI generated
revision of spatial plan municipal building permit standing against building permit town-planning scheme planning permission variance standing to appeal Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese
This order dictates that no fees or costs are to be collected.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

This order dictates that no fees or costs are to be collected.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.95.00087 · Lugano 19 novembre 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 1 giugno 1995 di

1. __________ __________ -__________, __________,

2. __________ __________, __________. __________,

1.,2. avv. __________. __________, __________ __________, contro

la risoluzione del __________aprile 1995 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva alcune varianti di Piano Regolatore del Comune di __________ __________;

viste le osservazioni 30 gennaio 1996 del Consiglio di Stato e 6 luglio 1995 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all’udienza del 15 novembre 1996 il rappresentante del ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _________ _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario