Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1995.67 • TRPI TI 90.1995.67 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal in Regulatory Plan Challenge

Case Number 90.1995.67
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The administrative planning court addressed an appeal filed against the State Council's resolution approving a municipality's regulatory plan. The court's decision to strike the appeal from the rolls was based solely on the appellant's declaration, submitted via letter, stating their intent to withdraw the challenge, thereby rendering the case moot.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Withdrawal in Regulatory Plan Challenge: The court's decision to strike the appeal from the rolls was based solely on the appellant's declaration, submitted via letter, stating their intent to withdraw the challenge, thereby rendering the case moot.

Keywords

AI generated
challenge of administrative decisions withdrawal of legal petition planning approval standing to appeal action for annulment procedural preliminary objections Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The decision rules not to charge fees and costs, citing the relevant article.
AI generated
90.1996.6
Appeal Withdrawal in Regulatory Plan Challenge
90.1994.134
Municipality Regulatory Plan Appeal Withdrawal
90.1997.91
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Regulatory Plan Approval
90.1996.118
Appeal Withdrawal Regarding Municipality Regulatory Plan Approval
90.2002.169
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Regulatory Plan Approval

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The decision rules not to charge fees and costs, citing the relevant article.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.95.00067 · Lugano 29 maggio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 29 aprile 1995 di

__________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato del __________marzo 1995 che approva il Piano regolatore del Comune di __________o

viste le osservazioni 5 settembre 1995 del Consiglio di Stato e 24 maggio 1995 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 21 maggio 1996 la ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, __________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, ____________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario