Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1995.62 • TRPI TI 90.1995.62 AI generated

Appeal of Land Use Plan Revisions Struck Due to Withdrawal

Case Number 90.1995.62
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party appealed a governmental resolution approving revisions to the local land use plan and the inventory of buildings situated outside building zones; however, the court struck the appeal from the record because the appellant's representative formally withdrew the challenge via a letter dated January 2, 1996, rendering the case moot, and consequently ordered no collection of fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal of Land Use Plan Revisions Struck Due to Withdrawal: A party appealed a governmental resolution approving revisions to the local land use plan and the inventory of buildings situated outside building zones; however, the court struck the appeal from the record because the appellant's representative formally withdrew the challenge via a letter dated January 2, 1996, rendering the case moot, and consequently ordered no collection of fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
land and buildings revision of spatial plan building plan standing against building permit special land-use plan withdrawal of petition Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1997.162
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Land Use Plan Revision
90.1997.164
Appeal Withdrawal Renders Land Use Plan Challenge Moot
90.2002.24
Appeal Withdrawal in Land-Use Plan Dispute
90.1995.159
Land-Use Plan Revision Appeal Withdrawn Due to Mootness
90.1995.24
Appeal of Municipal Land Use Plan Dismissed Due to Withdrawal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This order dictates that no taxes or expenses are to be levied, concerning the procedural handling of costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.95.00062 · Lugano 3 gennaio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 26 aprile 1995 di

__________ __________, __________, rappr. da: avv. __________ __________, __________ __________, contro

la risoluzione governativa nr. __________ del __________ ottobre 1995 che approva le varianti del PR (revisione) e dell'inventario degli edifici situati fuori dalle zone edificabili del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 3 ottobre 1995 del Consiglio di Stato e 28 giugno 1995 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 2 gennaio 1996 il rappresentante della ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, ___________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, __________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario