Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1995.59 • TRPI TI 90.1995.59 AI generated

Municipality's Withdrawn Zoning Plan Appeal

Case Number 90.1995.59
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A municipality filed an appeal against a State Council resolution approving a revision to the local Zoning Plan; however, the appealing municipality subsequently withdrew the challenge through a letter dated May 8, 1996, leading the Territorial Planning Tribunal to deem the matter moot and consequently strike the appeal from the docket without imposing costs or fees.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Non si prelevano tasse e spese; Municipality's Withdrawn Zoning Plan Appeal: A municipality filed an appeal against a State Council resolution approving a revision to the local Zoning Plan; however, the appealing municipality subsequently withdrew the challenge through a letter dated May 8, 1996, leading the Territorial Planning Tribunal to deem the matter moot and consequently strike the appeal from the docket without imposing costs or fees.

Keywords

AI generated
revision of zoning plan zoning exclusion standing against building permit planning costs town-planning scheme municipal building permit Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Non si prelevano tasse e spese
This article is explicitly cited in the dispositive orders regarding the allocation of costs.
AI generated
90.1995.23
State Council Zoning Plan Appeal Withdrawal
90.1998.25
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Municipal Territorial Zoning Plan
90.1995.157
Local Government Withdrawal of Zoning Appeal
90.2002.160
Withdrawal of Zoning Plan Appeal
90.1997.79
Withdrawal of Zoning Plan Amendment Appeal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

This article is explicitly cited in the dispositive orders regarding the allocation of costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.95.00059 · Lugano 13 maggio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 26 aprile 1995 di

Comune di __________, __________, rappr. da: Municipio di __________, __________ __________, contro

la risoluzione nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato del 28 marzo 1995 che approva una variente del Piano Regolatore (revisione) del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 5 settembre 1995 del Consiglio di Stato;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 8 maggio 1996 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, ____________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, ___________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario