Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1995.55 • TRPI TI 90.1995.55 AI generated

Withdrawal of Appeal Due to Mootness

Case Number 90.1995.55
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal on April 26, 1995, against a decision, but subsequently informed the court via a letter dated December 20, 1995, that they were withdrawing the challenge, rendering the legal matter moot; consequently, the Territorial Planning Tribunal ordered the appeal to be struck from the rolls without levying any fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese; Withdrawal of Appeal Due to Mootness: A party filed an appeal on April 26, 1995, against a decision, but subsequently informed the court via a letter dated December 20, 1995, that they were withdrawing the challenge, rendering the legal matter moot; consequently, the Territorial Planning Tribunal ordered the appeal to be struck from the rolls without levying any fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of petition appealable interlocutory decision right of removal late procedural objections administrative revocation of decision transfer rendered moot Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese
This order determines that no court fees or costs shall be collected.
AI generated
90.1996.66
Appeal Withdrawal and Mootness Ruling
90.1996.23
Appeal Withdrawal Leading to Mootness Ruling
90.2001.25
Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness
90.2001.23
Withdrawal of Appeal on Mootness Grounds
90.2001.109
Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

This order determines that no court fees or costs shall be collected.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.95.00055 · Lugano 2 gennaio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 26 aprile 1995 di

__________ __________, __________, contro

viste le osservazioni 3 ottobre 1995 del Consiglio di Stato e 28 giugno 1995 del

Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 20 dicembre 1995 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l'impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, ___________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, __________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario