Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1995.50 • TRPI TI 90.1995.50 AI generated

Administrative Appeal Withdrawal and Mootness Ruling

Case Number 90.1995.50
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

An appeal was filed by a local administrative body against a State Council resolution approving the revised Master Plan of a municipality. The Court noted that the appellant subsequently informed the court by letter that they were withdrawing the appeal. Consequently, the Court ruled that the matter had become moot and ordered the appeal to be struck from the docket, with no assessment of fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Administrative Appeal Withdrawal and Mootness Ruling: The Court noted that the appellant subsequently informed the court by letter that they were withdrawing the appeal. Consequently, the Court ruled that the matter had become moot and ordered the appeal to be struck from the docket, with no assessment of fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative revocation of decision administrative fees withdrawal of petition application to an administrative authority appealable interlocutory decision right of removal Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
52.1999.83
Administrative Appeal Mootness Due to Withdrawal
52.1998.32
Administrative Appeal Dismissed Upon Withdrawal
52.2000.314
Administrative Appeal Dismissed Due to Withdrawal
90.2001.27
Appeal Moot Due to Withdrawal
52.1997.237
Administrative Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This order disposes of the procedural aspect concerning the collection of fees and expenses, stating none shall be levied.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.95.00050 · Lugano 13 febbraio 1997 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 24 aprile 1995 di

Patriziato di __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione __________marzo 1995 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva il Piano Regolatore (revisione) del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 5 settembre 1995 del Consiglio di Stato e 24 maggio 1995 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 1 febbraio 1997 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di ______

- Consiglio di Stato, __________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, __________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario