Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1995.34 • TRPI TI 90.1995.34 AI generated

Petitioner's Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Zoning Plan Amendment

Case Number 90.1995.34
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A petitioner filed an appeal against a State Council resolution that approved a zoning plan amendment concerning the inventory of buildings located outside buildable zones in a specific municipality. The court struck the appeal from the rolls because the appellant subsequently declared, via letter, their withdrawal of the challenge, rendering the case moot, and consequently ordered that no fees or costs be levied.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Non si prelevano tasse e spese; Petitioner's Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Zoning Plan Amendment: The court struck the appeal from the rolls because the appellant subsequently declared, via letter, their withdrawal of the challenge, rendering the case moot, and consequently ordered that no fees or costs be levied.

Keywords

AI generated
zoning plan withdrawal of petition standing against building permit amendment of land-use zone procedural objections block exemption Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Non si prelevano tasse e spese
This part of the dispositive explicitly rules on the non-imposition of court fees and costs.
AI generated
90.1997.36
Petitioner Withdrawal of Zoning Plan Appeal
90.1997.34
Zoning Plan Amendment Challenge Withdrawal
90.1997.43
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Zoning Plan Amendment
90.1997.79
Withdrawal of Zoning Plan Amendment Appeal
90.1997.33
Appeal Withdrawal Regarding Zoning Plan Amendment

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

This part of the dispositive explicitly rules on the non-imposition of court fees and costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.95.00034 · Lugano 14 luglio 1997 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 16 marzo 1995 di

__________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione 14 febbraio 1995 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva la variante di Piano Regolatore concernente l’inventario degli edifici situati fuori dalle zone edificabili del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 7 giugno 1995 del Consiglio di Stato e 11 maggio 1995 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 9 luglio 1997 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - _________ ____, ___________

- Municipio di _____

- Consiglio di Stato, _________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, ___________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario