Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1995.28 • TRPI TI 90.1995.28 AI generated

Mootness of Zoning Appeal Upon Withdrawal

Case Number 90.1995.28
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

An appeal was filed against a governmental resolution approving zoning plan variations for a municipality. During an on-site inspection, the appellant declared their intention to withdraw the challenge to the resolution. Consequently, the court determined that the legal matter had become moot and ordered the appeal to be struck from the record without imposing any fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Non si prelevano tasse e spese; Mootness of Zoning Appeal Upon Withdrawal: During an on-site inspection, the appellant declared their intention to withdraw the challenge to the resolution. Consequently, the court determined that the legal matter had become moot and ordered the appeal to be struck from the record without imposing any fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
zoning plan standing against building permit legal fees withdrawal of legal petition appealable interlocutory decision administrative revocation of decision Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Non si prelevano tasse e spese
This article is cited in the dispositive section regarding the decision on costs.
AI generated
90.1997.5
Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Zoning Case
90.1996.112
Withdrawal of Zoning Appeal Renders Case Moot
90.1995.165
Appeal Withdrawal Renders Zoning Dispute Moot
90.1995.162
Zoning Appeal Dismissed Upon Withdrawal
90.1994.1
Appeal Withdrawal in Zoning Dispute

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

This article is cited in the dispositive section regarding the decision on costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.95.00028 · Lugano 28 agosto 1995 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 22 febbraio 1995 di

__________ __________, __________ __________, contro

la risoluzione governativa nr. __________del 1. febbraio 1995 che approva le varianti di PR del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 9 maggio 1995 del Consiglio di Stato e 17 luglio 1995 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che al sopralluogo del 24 agosto 1995 la ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - ___ __________, __________

- Municipio di ___________

- Consiglio di Stato, ____________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, ___________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario