Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1995.24 • TRPI TI 90.1995.24 AI generated

Appeal of Municipal Land Use Plan Dismissed Due to Withdrawal

Case Number 90.1995.24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

An appeal was filed against a governmental resolution approving a municipality's Land Use Plan, but the reviewing court dismissed the case because the appellants subsequently informed the court via letter that they were withdrawing their challenge, rendering the matter moot.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese; Appeal of Municipal Land Use Plan Dismissed Due to Withdrawal: An appeal was filed against a governmental resolution approving a municipality's Land Use Plan, but the reviewing court dismissed the case because the appellants subsequently informed the court via letter that they were withdrawing their challenge, rendering the matter moot.

Keywords

AI generated
municipal land planning approval standing against building permit special land-use plan withdrawal of legal petition revocation of settlement permit Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese
This order dictates that no fees or costs are to be collected.
AI generated
90.2002.20
Appeal Withdrawn Against Municipal Land-Use Plan Approval
90.1996.16
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Land-Use Plan Resolution
90.1994.108
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Municipal Regulatory Plan
90.1994.294
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Plan Amendment
90.1995.62
Appeal of Land Use Plan Revisions Struck Due to Withdrawal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

This order dictates that no fees or costs are to be collected.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.95.00024 · Lugano 21 agosto 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 13 febbraio 1995 di

__________ e __________ __________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione del Consiglio di Stato nr. __________del 17 gennaio 1995 che approva il Piano Regolatore del Comune di __________ -__________;

viste le osservazioni 9 maggio 1995 del Consiglio di Stato e 27 aprile 1995 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 14 agosto 1996 i ricorrenti hanno dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di ______-_______

- Consiglio di Stato, __________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, _________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario