Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1995.23 • TRPI TI 90.1995.23 AI generated

State Council Zoning Plan Appeal Withdrawal

Case Number 90.1995.23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A challenge was brought against the State Council's resolution approving a municipal zoning plan, but the appellants subsequently informed the court via letter on March 10, 1999, that they were withdrawing their appeal, leading the Territorial Planning Court to deem the case moot and order the appeal struck from the roll without imposing fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese; State Council Zoning Plan Appeal Withdrawal: A challenge was brought against the State Council's resolution approving a municipal zoning plan, but the appellants subsequently informed the court via letter on March 10, 1999, that they were withdrawing their appeal, leading the Territorial Planning Court to deem the case moot and order the appeal struck from the roll without imposing fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
zoning plan planning costs standing against building permit revision of spatial plan deemed withdrawal municipal building permit Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese
This order addresses the non-levying of taxes and expenses, which pertains to the costs of the procedure.
AI generated
90.1995.59
Municipality's Withdrawn Zoning Plan Appeal
90.1997.79
Withdrawal of Zoning Plan Amendment Appeal
90.2002.151
Appeal Withdrawal in Zoning Plan Dispute
90.2002.52
Withdrawal of Zoning Plan Appeal
90.1998.25
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Municipal Territorial Zoning Plan

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

This order addresses the non-levying of taxes and expenses, which pertains to the costs of the procedure.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.95.00023 · Lugano 15 marzo 1999 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 30 gennaio 1995 di

1. __________ __________, __________ __________ __________,

2. __________ __________, __________ __________ __________, contro

la risoluzione 20 dicembre 1994 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva il Piano Regolatore del comune di __________ __________ __________;

viste le osservazioni 20 giugno 1995 del Consiglio di Stato e 19 giugno 1995 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 10 marzo 1999 i ricorrenti hanno dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3.

Intimazione a: · - ing. __________ __________, __________

- __________ __________, __________ __________ __________

- Municipio di ______ ___ ______

- Consiglio di Stato, ___________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, __________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario