Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1995.167 • TRPI TI 90.1995.167 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Zoning Dispute

Case Number 90.1995.167
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal on December 28, 1995, challenging the State Council's resolution of November 1995, which approved the zoning plan for a municipality. The court ruled on the matter after considering responses from the State Council and the municipality, and noting that at a hearing on September 12, 1996, the appellant declared the withdrawal of the appeal, leading the court to conclude that the case had become moot and ordered the appeal to be struck from the record without assessing fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 66 cpv. 2 LOC; Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Zoning Dispute: The court ruled on the matter after considering responses from the State Council and the municipality, and noting that at a hearing on September 12, 1996, the appellant declared the withdrawal of the appeal, leading the court to conclude that the case had become moot and ordered the appeal to be struck from the record without assessing fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
zoning plan matter in dispute hearing of the parties withdrawal of legal petition right of removal late procedural objections Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 66 cpv. 2 LOC
This provision is inferred as the basis for the decision not to charge fees and costs when the case becomes moot due to withdrawal.
AI generated
90.1997.5
Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Zoning Case
90.1994.249
Appeal Withdrawal Rendering Zoning Dispute Moot
90.1995.28
Mootness of Zoning Appeal Upon Withdrawal
90.1994.1
Appeal Withdrawal in Zoning Dispute
90.1996.112
Withdrawal of Zoning Appeal Renders Case Moot

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 66 cpv. 2 LOC

This provision is inferred as the basis for the decision not to charge fees and costs when the case becomes moot due to withdrawal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.95.00167 · Lugano 13 settembre 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 28 dicembre 1995 di

__________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione del Consiglio di Stato nr. __________del __________novembre 1995 che approva il Piano Regolatore del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 21 marzo 1996 del Consiglio di Stato e 15 maggio 1996 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all’udienza del 12 settembre 1996 la ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario