Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1995.164 • TRPI TI 90.1995.164 AI generated

Municipality v. State Council (Withdrawal of Appeal)

Case Number 90.1995.164
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A municipality filed an appeal against a State Council resolution concerning the adoption of a planning zone for the semi-interchange project between two municipalities. However, the appellant subsequently declared the withdrawal of the appeal via a letter dated January 26, 2001, leading the Territory Planning Tribunal to rule that the case had become moot and ordered the appeal to be struck from the rolls without imposing fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Municipality v. State Council (Withdrawal of Appeal): However, the appellant subsequently declared the withdrawal of the appeal via a letter dated January 26, 2001, leading the Territory Planning Tribunal to rule that the case had become moot and ordered the appeal to be struck from the rolls without imposing fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
municipal land planning costs authorities' referendum withdrawal of petition standing against building permit town-planning scheme Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1994.112
Municipality v. State Council (Withdrawal of Appeal)
90.1997.22
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipality and State Council
52.1999.345
Municipality v. State Council: Appeal Withdrawal
90.1996.116
Municipality v. State Council (Appeal Withdrawn)
90.1996.118
Appeal Withdrawal Regarding Municipality Regulatory Plan Approval

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This order dictates that no fees or expenses shall be levied, based on the withdrawal of the appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.1995.00164 · Lugano 30 gennaio 2001 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 21 dicembre 1995 di

Comune di __________ __________, __________ __________, rappr. da: dr.iur. h.c. __________ __________, __________ __________, contro

la risoluzione __________ottobre 1995 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato, adozione della zona di pianificazione del comparto di progettazione dei semiallacciamenti alla __________ Comuni di __________ e __________;

viste le osservazioni 7 maggio 1996 del Consiglio di Stato;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 26 gennaio 2001 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario