Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1995.162 • TRPI TI 90.1995.162 AI generated

Zoning Appeal Dismissed Upon Withdrawal

Case Number 90.1995.162
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

An appeal was filed challenging a municipal zoning resolution, but the reviewing court dismissed the matter because the appellant formally withdrew the challenge via a letter dated September 17, 1996, rendering the case moot; consequently, the court struck the case from the rolls and assessed no fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese; Zoning Appeal Dismissed Upon Withdrawal: An appeal was filed challenging a municipal zoning resolution, but the reviewing court dismissed the matter because the appellant formally withdrew the challenge via a letter dated September 17, 1996, rendering the case moot; consequently, the court struck the case from the rolls and assessed no fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
zoning exclusion withdrawal of legal petition standing against building permit revision of zoning plan revocation of a permit termination of residential lease Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese
This order dictates that no fees or costs will be collected.
AI generated
90.1994.1
Appeal Withdrawal in Zoning Dispute
90.1997.153
Appeal Struck Due to Appellant's Withdrawal of Zoning Challenge
90.1996.56
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Zoning Challenge
90.2003.55
Appeal Dismissed After Withdrawal of Zoning Challenge
90.1995.28
Mootness of Zoning Appeal Upon Withdrawal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

This order dictates that no fees or costs will be collected.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.95.00162 · Lugano 20 settembre 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 2 ottobre 1995 di

__________ __________, __________, contro

la zona di pianificazione del Comune di __________ (risoluzione municipale nr. __________/__________);

viste le osservazioni 23 ottobre 1995 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 17 settembre 1996 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - _________ _________, _________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario