Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1995.161 • TRPI TI 90.1995.161 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal in Municipal Planning Zone Dispute

Case Number 90.1995.161
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A planning court addressed an appeal filed in October 1995 against a State Council resolution concerning a municipal planning zone, but the court ultimately dismissed the case from the rolls because the appellant, through their representative, formally withdrew the appeal in January 2001, rendering the matter moot, and consequently ordered no collection of fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal in Municipal Planning Zone Dispute: A planning court addressed an appeal filed in October 1995 against a State Council resolution concerning a municipal planning zone, but the court ultimately dismissed the case from the rolls because the appellant, through their representative, formally withdrew the appeal in January 2001, rendering the matter moot, and consequently ordered no collection of fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
matter in dispute planning costs planning reserve zone town-planning scheme standing against building permit revision of spatial plan Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1995.137
Withdrawal of Planning Zone Appeal
90.1996.18
Appeal Withdrawal Regarding Municipal Zoning Resolution
90.2005.38
Petitioner's Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Planning Zone
90.2002.134
Appeal Withdrawal in Planning Zone Dispute
90.1998.25
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Municipal Territorial Zoning Plan

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This item in the dispositive orders that no taxes or fees are to be collected, indicating a procedural ruling regarding costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.1995.00161 · Lugano 11 gennaio 2001 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 25 ottobre 1995 di

__________ __________, __________, rappr. da: __________ __________, __________ __________, contro

la risoluzione __________novembre 1995 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato, Zona di pianificazione comunale, comparto __________ __________ Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 1° febbraio 1996 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 9 gennaio 2001 il rappresentante del ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - _________ _________, _________

- __________ __________, __________ - Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario