Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1995.144 • TRPI TI 90.1995.144 AI generated

Withdrawal of Appeal Against State Council Resolution Upheld

Case Number 90.1995.144
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal challenging a State Council resolution that approved a specific local development plan; however, the court dismissed the appeal and struck it from the rolls because the appellant formally withdrew the challenge during a hearing, rendering the case without an object, and consequently, no fees or costs were assessed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Withdrawal of Appeal Against State Council Resolution Upheld: A party filed an appeal challenging a State Council resolution that approved a specific local development plan; however, the court dismissed the appeal and struck it from the rolls because the appellant formally withdrew the challenge during a hearing, rendering the case without an object, and consequently, no fees or costs were assessed.

Keywords

AI generated
hearing of the parties deemed withdrawal of opposition standing to appeal objection of unconstitutionality administrative revocation of decision right of removal Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1999.16
Appeal Dismissed Due to Withdrawal of Challenge
90.1994.213
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge
90.1997.165
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge
90.1996.120
Appeal Dismissed Due to Withdrawal
90.1994.62
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This order dictates that no taxes or fees are to be collected, relating to the disposition of costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.95.00144 · Lugano 8 maggio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 26 ottobre 1995 di

__________, __________, contro

la risoluzione nr. ____ del Consiglio di Stato del 19 settembre 1995 che approva il Piano Particolareggiato del _______- ______(PRP-PF)

viste le osservazioni 5 gennaio 1996 del Consiglio di Stato e 21 dicembre 1995 del Comune di _________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all’udienza del 3 maggio 1996 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - ____________, __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario