Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1995.130 • TRPI TI 90.1995.130 AI generated

Appeal of Municipality's General Development Plan Withdrawn

Case Number 90.1995.130
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal against a State Council resolution approving amendments to a Municipality's General Development Plan, but subsequently informed the court by letter that the appeal was withdrawn. Consequently, the court determined the matter was moot and decreed that the appeal be struck from the record without imposing any fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal of Municipality's General Development Plan Withdrawn: Consequently, the court determined the matter was moot and decreed that the appeal be struck from the record without imposing any fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
town-planning scheme standing against building permit development costs standing of the municipality revision of spatial plan municipal building permit Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1998.118
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Local Development Plan Approval
90.1998.130
Appeal of Municipality Master Plan Withdrawn
90.2000.41
Appeal Withdrawn and Case Dismissed
90.1995.85
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Master Plan Approval
90.1994.302
Municipality Regulatory Plan Appeal Withdrawn

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This order dictates that no fees or costs are to be levied, indicating a procedural ruling regarding expenses.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.95.00130 · Lugano 31 ottobre 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 7 settembre 1995 di

__________ __________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione del __________luglio 1995 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva alcune varianti di Piano Regolatore del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 30 gennaio 1996 del Consiglio di Stato e 4 ottobre 1995 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 28 ottobre 1996 il rappresentante del ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario