Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1994.80 • TRPI TI 90.1994.80 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawn: Monumental Complex Protection Area

Case Number 90.1994.80
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Planning Court addressed an appeal filed against an executive decree concerning the protection area of a monumental complex, but the appeal was declared withdrawn by the appellant during the hearing on October 13, 1995, leading the court to rule that the matter had become moot and consequently ordered the case to be struck from the rolls without imposing any fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Non si prelevano tasse e spese; Appeal Withdrawn: Monumental Complex Protection Area: The Planning Court addressed an appeal filed against an executive decree concerning the protection area of a monumental complex, but the appeal was declared withdrawn by the appellant during the hearing on October 13, 1995, leading the court to rule that the matter had become moot and consequently ordered the case to be struck from the rolls without imposing any fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
standing against building permit planning costs protection of historical monuments zoning exclusion protected townscape zone subject to mandatory planning Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Non si prelevano tasse e spese
This provision dictates the non-collection of taxes and costs in the final orders.
AI generated
90.1994.79
Appeal Withdrawal Regarding Monumental Complex Protection Zone
90.2002.132
Appeal Withdrawal Regarding Historical Center Planning Zone
52.1997.48
Appeal Withdrawn Regarding Building Permit and Retaining Wall Dispute
90.1995.137
Withdrawal of Planning Zone Appeal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

This provision dictates the non-collection of taxes and costs in the final orders.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.94.00080 · Lugano 26 gennaio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 1 giugno 1990 di

__________ e __________ __________ __________, __________ /__________, contro

il decreto esecutivo del 16 maggio 1990 concernente il comprensorio di protezione del complesso monumentale di __________;

viste le osservazioni 17 luglio 1995 del Consiglio di Stato e 4 luglio 1990 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all'udienza del 13 ottobre 1995 avete dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, ____________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, __________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario