Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1994.79 • TRPI TI 90.1994.79 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal Regarding Monumental Complex Protection Zone

Case Number 90.1994.79
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A litigant filed an appeal on June 1, 1990, challenging an executive decree dated May 16, 1990, concerning the protection zone for a monumental complex. Following observations from the State Council and the local municipality, the appealing party explicitly withdrew the challenge during a hearing on October 13, 1995, leading the court to rule that the case had become moot and consequently strike the appeal from the roll without awarding costs or fees.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Withdrawal Regarding Monumental Complex Protection Zone: Following observations from the State Council and the local municipality, the appealing party explicitly withdrew the challenge during a hearing on October 13, 1995, leading the court to rule that the case had become moot and consequently strike the appeal from the roll without awarding costs or fees.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of petition state protection right of removal standing against building permit appealable interlocutory decision hearing of the parties Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1994.80
Appeal Withdrawn: Monumental Complex Protection Area
90.2002.132
Appeal Withdrawal Regarding Historical Center Planning Zone
52.1997.48
Appeal Withdrawn Regarding Building Permit and Retaining Wall Dispute
90.1995.167
Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Zoning Dispute
90.1999.35
Petitioner Withdrawal Renders Appeal Moot

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This order dictates that no fees or costs are to be collected from the parties.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.94.00079 · Lugano 26 gennaio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 1 giugno 1990 di

Parrocchia di __________, __________, contro

il decreto esecutivo del 16 maggio 1990 concernente il comprensorio di protezione del complesso monumentale di __________;

viste le osservazioni 17 luglio 1995 del Consiglio di Stato e 4 luglio 1990 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all'udienza del 13 ottobre 1995 avete dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · ___________________ __ ___________

- Municipio di _______

- Consiglio di Stato, _________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, _________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario