Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1994.316 • TRPI TI 90.1994.316 AI generated

Appeal of Port Regulatory Plan Amendment Rendered Moot by Settlement Agreement

Case Number 90.1994.316
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party filed an appeal against a State Council resolution approving a local regulatory plan amendment concerning a municipal port; however, the court struck the appeal from the record because the parties executed an agreement on March 11, 1996, leading to the withdrawal of the appeal, thereby rendering the case moot, and consequently, no court fees or expenses were levied.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal of Port Regulatory Plan Amendment Rendered Moot by Settlement Agreement: A party filed an appeal against a State Council resolution approving a local regulatory plan amendment concerning a municipal port; however, the court struck the appeal from the record because the parties executed an agreement on March 11, 1996, leading to the withdrawal of the appeal, thereby rendering the case moot, and consequently, no court fees or expenses were levied.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer rendered moot settlement of dispute appealable interlocutory decision amendment of the claim amendment of land-use zone revocation of settlement permit Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1996.91
Appeal of Zoning Amendment Resolution Dismissed as Moot
90.1996.89
Appeal Moot Due to Superseding Regulatory Plan Amendment
90.2000.83
Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Regulatory Plan Challenge
90.1998.121
Mootness of Appeal Regarding Regulatory Plan Amendment After Withdrawal
12.2001.97
Appeal Moot Due to Settlement

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
1.

This order dictates that the appeal is struck from the rolls because the parties withdrew it.

2.

This order dictates that no fees or costs shall be levied.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.94.00316 · Lugano 3 aprile 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 21 settembre 1994 della

_ _, _, rappr. da: _ _ _, _ _, contro

la risoluzione nr. _del Consiglio di Stato del 12 agosto 1994 che approva una variante (porto Comunale) al Piano Regolatore di _;

viste le osservazioni 15 novembre 1994 del Consiglio di Stato e 28 novembre 1994 del

Comune di _;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che fra le parti è intervenuto un accordo sottoscritto l'11 marzo 1996 con il quale ritirano il ricorso;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - _ di _ - _. _, _

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario