Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1994.282 • TRPI TI 90.1994.282 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawn Against State Council Development Plan Approval

Case Number 90.1994.282
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The case involved an appeal filed against a State Council decision approving a detailed local development plan for a specific area; however, the proceeding became moot because the representative for the appellants formally withdrew the challenge via a letter dated June 16, 1995, leading the Planning Tribunal to strike the appeal from the rolls without assessing any fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Withdrawn Against State Council Development Plan Approval: The case involved an appeal filed against a State Council decision approving a detailed local development plan for a specific area; however, the proceeding became moot because the representative for the appellants formally withdrew the challenge via a letter dated June 16, 1995, leading the Planning Tribunal to strike the appeal from the rolls without assessing any fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
planning approval standing against building permit development costs withdrawal of petition special land-use plan state action Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1998.118
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Local Development Plan Approval
90.2002.57
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Regional Development Plan Approval
90.1997.20
Appeal Withdrawn and Dismissed
90.2003.65
State Council Decision Appeal Withdrawal
90.1995.23
State Council Zoning Plan Appeal Withdrawal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This order waives the collection of fees and costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.94.00284 · Lugano 19 giugno 1995 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 14 settembre 1993 di

__________ __________ e __________, __________ rappr. da: avv. __________. __________, __________ __________, contro

la decisione 13 luglio 1993 no. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva il PR di __________, settore 1 - Particolareggiato di Piazza __________ ed evade i ricorsi di prima istanza;

viste le osservazioni 13 settembre 1994 del Consiglio di Stato e 13 dicembre 1993 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 16 giugno 1995 il rappresentante dei ricorrenti ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - Avv. __________ __________, __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario