Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1994.244 • TRPI TI 90.1994.244 AI generated

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal

Case Number 90.1994.244
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The petitioners filed an appeal in January 1982 against a governmental resolution from October 1981 that approved zoning plan variations for a municipality, but subsequently, by correspondence in December 1995, the appellants declared their withdrawal of the challenge. Consequently, the court determined the matter had become moot and ordered the appeal to be struck from the roll without imposing fees or expenses.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese; Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal: Consequently, the court determined the matter had become moot and ordered the appeal to be struck from the roll without imposing fees or expenses.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of petition standing to appeal administrative revocation of decision action for removal duration of judicial expulsion late procedural objections Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese
The order specifies that no court fees or costs are to be collected regarding the disposition.
AI generated
90.1998.28
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal
90.1994.272
Appeal Withdrawal and Dismissal
90.1994.263
Appeal Withdrawal and Case Termination
90.1994.245
Appeal Withdrawal and Mootness of Zoning Challenge
90.1994.249
Appeal Withdrawal Rendering Zoning Dispute Moot

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

The order specifies that no court fees or costs are to be collected regarding the disposition.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.94.00244 · Lugano 27 dicembre 1995 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 11 gennaio 1982 di

1. __________ __________, 2. __________ __________ -__________, __________, contro

la risoluzione governativa nr. __________del 19 ottobre 1981 che approva le varianti di PR del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 17 luglio 1995 del Consiglio di Stato;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 9 e 11 dicembre 1995 le ricorrenti hanno dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- __________ -__________ __________, __________ - Municipio di ______ rappr. da avv. __________, __________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario