Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1994.221 • TRPI TI 90.1994.221 AI generated

Appeal Withdrawn After Municipal Assurances

Case Number 90.1994.221
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

An appeal was filed against a State Council decision that approved the specific development plan for a city center area and rejected prior appeals; however, the appellant subsequently withdrew the appeal after receiving assurances from the local municipality, leading the Territorial Planning Tribunal to rule that the case had become moot and to strike the appeal from the record without imposing fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Withdrawn After Municipal Assurances: An appeal was filed against a State Council decision that approved the specific development plan for a city center area and rejected prior appeals; however, the appellant subsequently withdrew the appeal after receiving assurances from the local municipality, leading the Territorial Planning Tribunal to rule that the case had become moot and to strike the appeal from the record without imposing fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
planning costs approval of municipal regulations standing against building permit standing of the municipality withdrawal of petition authorities' referendum Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.2000.41
Appeal Withdrawn and Case Dismissed
90.2003.50
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Master Plan Revision
52.1998.344
Appeal Withdrawn Against Municipal Construction Denial
90.1997.189
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Municipal Territorial Plan Approval
90.1998.118
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Local Development Plan Approval

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This procedural order indicates that no taxes or expenses are to be collected in this case.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.94.00221 · Lugano 26 maggio 1995 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Lorenzo Anastasi, Raffaello Balerna

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 29 dicembre 1993 di

__________ __________, __________. __________ __________, Contro

la decisione 15 dicembre 1993 (nr. __________) del Consiglio di Stato che approva il Piano Particolareggiato della zona del centro cittadino di __________ ed evade i ricorsi interposti contro di esso in prima istanza;

viste le osservazioni 31 maggio 1994 del Consiglio di Stato e 8 luglio 1994 del Comune

di________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto lo scritto 19 maggio 1995 con il quale il ricorrente, preso atto della garanzia rilasciatagli dal Municipio di __________, dichiara di ritirare il ricorso;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · __________

- Municipio di ________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario