Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1994.136 • TRPI TI 90.1994.136 AI generated

Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Development Plan Approval

Case Number 90.1994.136
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Territorial Planning Court considered an appeal filed against the resolution approving a municipality's development plan; however, the court struck the appeal from the record because the appellant, on behalf of all concerned parties, formally withdrew the challenge via a letter dated December 1, 1997, rendering the case without object, and consequently ordered no collection of fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Development Plan Approval: The Territorial Planning Court considered an appeal filed against the resolution approving a municipality's development plan; however, the court struck the appeal from the record because the appellant, on behalf of all concerned parties, formally withdrew the challenge via a letter dated December 1, 1997, rendering the case without object, and consequently ordered no collection of fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
planning approval municipal building permit development costs standing against building permit withdrawal of legal petition revocation of settlement permit Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.2002.168
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Development Plan Approval
90.1994.108
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Municipal Regulatory Plan
90.1998.118
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Local Development Plan Approval
90.1997.189
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Municipal Territorial Plan Approval
90.1994.308
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Zoning Plan Approval

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
1.

The final order declares the appeal struck from the roll because it became devoid of object.

2.

The final order dictates that no fees or costs are to be levied.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.94.00136 · Lugano 3 dicembre 1997 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 17 maggio 1991 di

1. __________ __________ -__________, __________,

2. __________ __________, __________,

3. __________ __________, __________,

contro

la risoluzione 9 aprile 1991 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva il Piano Regolatore del Comune di __________ __________;

viste le osservazioni 5 maggio 1993 del Consiglio di Stato;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 1° dicembre 1997 la signora __________ -__________ __________, per sé e per __________ __________ e __________ __________ ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________ -__________ __________, __________

- Municipio di ________ ____________

- Consiglio di Stato, _____________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, ___________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario