Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1994.112 • TRPI TI 90.1994.112 AI generated

Municipality v. State Council (Withdrawal of Appeal)

Case Number 90.1994.112
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A municipality filed an appeal on February 15, 1991, challenging a resolution by the State Council dated January 9, 1991, which approved the municipality's own regulatory plan. However, the court noted that the appellant's representative formally withdrew the challenge via a letter dated July 24, 1996, rendering the case moot. Consequently, the Planning Tribunal decreed that the appeal was struck from the roll, and no fees or costs were to be assessed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Municipality v. State Council (Withdrawal of Appeal): However, the court noted that the appellant's representative formally withdrew the challenge via a letter dated July 24, 1996, rendering the case moot. Consequently, the Planning Tribunal decreed that the appeal was struck from the roll, and no fees or costs were to be assessed.

Keywords

AI generated
planning costs municipal ordinance withdrawal of petition authorities' referendum absence of municipal obligation right of removal Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1995.164
Municipality v. State Council (Withdrawal of Appeal)
90.1996.116
Municipality v. State Council (Appeal Withdrawn)
90.1997.22
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipality and State Council
52.1999.345
Municipality v. State Council: Appeal Withdrawal
90.2003.86
Municipality Regulatory Plan Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This is the dispositive order concerning costs, stating that no fees or expenses shall be levied.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.94.00112 · Lugano 26 luglio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 15 febbraio 1991 di

Municipio di __________, __________, rappr. da: avv. __________ __________, __________ __________, contro

la risoluzione nr. __________del 9 gennaio 1991 del Consiglio di Stato, che approva il Piano Regolatore del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 12 aprile 1994 del Consiglio di Stato;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 24 luglio 1996 il rappresentante del ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, __________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, __________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario