Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1994.109 • TRPI TI 90.1994.109 AI generated

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge

Case Number 90.1994.109
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

An appeal was filed against a State Council resolution approving a municipal zoning plan amendment; however, the court noted that the appellant formally withdrew the challenge via letter, rendering the case devoid of object, and therefore ordered the appeal struck from the rolls without levying any fees or costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge: An appeal was filed against a State Council resolution approving a municipal zoning plan amendment; however, the court noted that the appellant formally withdrew the challenge via letter, rendering the case devoid of object, and therefore ordered the appeal struck from the rolls without levying any fees or costs.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of petition standing against building permit zoning plan standing to appeal administrative revocation of decision procedural objections Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1998.125
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge to Zoning Amendment
90.1996.56
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Zoning Challenge
90.1997.153
Appeal Struck Due to Appellant's Withdrawal of Zoning Challenge
90.1997.165
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge
90.1994.62
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal of Challenge

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This order dictates that no fees or costs are to be collected, although it is a procedural instruction within the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.94.00109 · Lugano 2 luglio 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 6 febbraio 1991 di

__________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione 9 gennaio 1991 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva la variante di PR del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 12 aprile 1994 del Consiglio di Stato;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 28 giugno 1996 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - ________ _________, ________

- Municipio di _____

- Consiglio di Stato, _________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, _________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario