Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
90.1994.104 • TRPI TI 90.1994.104 AI generated

Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Master Plan Approval

Case Number 90.1994.104
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Ticino (CH-TI)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A legal challenge was lodged against the resolution by a State Council approving a Municipality's Master Plan, but the proceeding became moot because the representative of the appellant formally declared the withdrawal of the appeal in a letter dated August 14, 1996; consequently, the Territorial Planning Tribunal ordered the appeal struck from the rolls and waived any collection of fees or expenses.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Master Plan Approval: A legal challenge was lodged against the resolution by a State Council approving a Municipality's Master Plan, but the proceeding became moot because the representative of the appellant formally declared the withdrawal of the appeal in a letter dated August 14, 1996; consequently, the Territorial Planning Tribunal ordered the appeal struck from the rolls and waived any collection of fees or expenses.

Keywords

AI generated
planning approval municipal building permit standing against building permit withdrawal of petition municipal autonomy revocation of settlement permit Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
AI generated
90.1998.135
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Master Plan Approval
90.1995.85
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Master Plan Approval
90.2002.25
Appeal Withdrawal and Case Dismissal in Municipal Master Plan Challenge
90.2002.23
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Municipal Master Plan Approval
90.2003.50
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Municipal Master Plan Revision

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
2.

This order dictates that no fees or expenses shall be charged (cost/expense provision).

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Incarto n. 90.94.00104 · Lugano 16 agosto 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 20 settembre 1990 di

__________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione nr. __________del 7 agosto 1990 del Consiglio di Stato che approva il Piano Regolatore del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 18 maggio 1994 del Consiglio di Stato e 23 novembre 1990 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 14 agosto 1996 il rappresentante del ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, ___________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, ___________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario