Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II 2025 38 • VG SZ II 2025 38 AI generated

Appeal Against Suspension of Unemployment Benefits for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer

Case Number II 2025 38
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The case involves an appeal against a decision by the Office for Labor to suspend entitlement to unemployment benefits due to the appellant's refusal of a suitable job offer. The court reasoned that the employment offered was objectively comparable to the appellant's previous employment in terms of duration, required qualifications, working hours, and salary, thereby meeting the legal criteria for a suitable job; consequently, the rejection of this offer justified the suspension of benefits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Suspension of Unemployment Benefits for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer: The court reasoned that the employment offered was objectively comparable to the appellant's previous employment in terms of duration, required qualifications, working hours, and salary, thereby meeting the legal criteria for a suitable job; consequently, the rejection of this offer justified the suspension of benefits.

Keywords

AI generated
suspension of unemployment benefits suitable employment unemployment entitlement to benefits prohibition of employment job sharing

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG
The appeal is dismissed because the contested decision is confirmed.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs because the appeal was dismissed.
AI generated
II 2018 14
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2021 98
Unemployment Benefit Suspension Upheld for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2018 40
Unemployment Benefits Termination for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2023 93
Unemployment Benefit Denial Upheld for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2020 97
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refused Job Offer Upheld, Period Reduced

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG

The appeal is dismissed because the contested decision is confirmed.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs because the appeal was dismissed.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n

\n \n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2025 38 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. August 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Pascal Pfeifhofer, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchs­berechtigung wegen Ablehnung einer zumutbaren Arbeit) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: