Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II 2025 14 • VG SZ II 2025 14 AI generated

Corporation v. District Council: Validity of Reciprocal Waste Fee

Case Number II 2025 14
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date

Legislator summary

AI generated

A corporation challenged the imposition of a basic waste fee, a type of reciprocal levy, by the district council. The corporation argued that the fee, charged irrespective of actual waste volume, was disproportionate because it generated significantly more revenue than the actual costs incurred for waste disposal services. The court reasoned that a cost-reimbursement principle applies to such fees, meaning the revenue should not substantially exceed the costs, and thus the fee structure was unlawful because the significant revenue surplus indicated the charge was not genuinely tied to the cost of the specific service provided.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Corporation v. District Council: Validity of Reciprocal Waste Fee: The corporation argued that the fee, charged irrespective of actual waste volume, was disproportionate because it generated significantly more revenue than the actual costs incurred for waste disposal services. The court reasoned that a cost-reimbursement principle applies to such fees, meaning the revenue should not substantially exceed the costs, and thus the fee structure was unlawful because the significant revenue surplus indicated the charge was not genuinely tied to the cost of the specific service provided.

Keywords

AI generated
waste disposal fee charging of fees validity of service environmental levy municipal waste water rights fee Kausalabgaben (Abfall-Grundgebühr) | Kausalabgaben
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2025 14 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. November 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Thomas Twerenbold, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Bezirksrat Küssnacht, Seeplatz 2/3, Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kausalabgaben (Abfall-Grundgebühr) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: