Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II 2024 94 • VG SZ II 2024 94 AI generated

Unemployment Benefits Cessation Due to Insufficient Job Search Efforts

Case Number II 2024 94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

An individual appealed a decision by the Employment Office that ceased their entitlement to unemployment insurance benefits due to insufficient personal efforts to find employment. The core issue was whether the appellant sufficiently demonstrated their job search activities as required by the unemployment insurance regulations. The court upheld the administrative decision, reasoning that the documentation and nature of the submitted job search efforts failed to meet the statutory minimum threshold of personal engagement expected of an insured person actively seeking re-employment.

Legislator headnote

Official

Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung wegen ungenügender persönlicher Arbeitsbemühungen) | Arbeitslosenversicherung

Keywords

AI generated
unemployment benefit cessation of benefits entitlement to insurance benefits duty to seek employment sufficiency of job search meeting the threshold

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. b BGG
Applied to order the appellant to pay the costs because the appeal was dismissed.
AI generated
II 2023 90
Unemployment Benefits Cessation for Insufficient Pre-Claim Job Search Efforts
II 2021 58
Unemployment Benefits Discontinuation for Insufficient Job Seeking
II 2021 77
Denial of Unemployment Benefits for Insufficient Job Search
II 2021 76
Claimant v. Employment Office (Unemployment Benefits Dispute)
II 2022 70
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Insufficient Job Search

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. b BGG

Applied to order the appellant to pay the costs because the appeal was dismissed.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2024 94 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Dezember 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Andrea Reutter, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung wegen ungenügender persönlicher Arbeitsbemühungen) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: