Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II 2024 45 • VG SZ II 2024 45 AI generated

Claimant v. Administrator re: Supplementary Housing Benefit Calculation

Case Number II 2024 45
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A claimant appealed a decision regarding supplementary benefits, specifically challenging the calculation of eligible housing costs, where the initial administrative body maintained a strict interpretation of the housing cost limits applicable to the claimant's situation. The court upheld the lower body's decision, reasoning that the established legal framework clearly defines the maximum reimbursable housing costs, and there was no factual basis or legal justification presented to warrant an exception or deviation from the mandated calculation method for determining the claimant's entitlement.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Claimant v. Administrator re: Supplementary Housing Benefit Calculation: The court upheld the lower body's decision, reasoning that the established legal framework clearly defines the maximum reimbursable housing costs, and there was no factual basis or legal justification presented to warrant an exception or deviation from the mandated calculation method for determining the claimant's entitlement.

Keywords

AI generated
calculation of supplementary benefits entitlement to benefits housing costs administrative costs basis of calculation framework decision Ergänzungsleistungen (anrechenbare Wohnkosten) | Ergänzungsleistungen
AI generated
II 2023 94
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefit Calculation and Rent Allowance
II 2020 85
Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets
II 2019 39
Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Calculation Based on Flawed Property Valuation.
II 2024 107
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefit Denial Due to Asset Valuation of Partially Rented Property
II 2020 69
Supplementary Benefit Asset Valuation Appeal

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2024 45 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. August 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Fiona Schuler, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Amtsbeiständin B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (anrechenbare Wohnkosten) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: