Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II 2024 42 • VG SZ II 2024 42 AI generated

Property Owners v. Municipality (Development Charges Limitation Period)

Case Number II 2024 42
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date

Legislator summary

AI generated

Property owners appealed a municipal decision imposing development charges, arguing the claim was time-barred because the underlying authorization had been granted years prior and the development charges were levied after the statutory limitation period had expired. The court determined that the limitation period for imposing such charges begins when the decision granting the construction permit becomes legally binding, and since the administrative act establishing the basis for the charge (the authorization) was finalized before the applicable statute of limitations expired, the claim for the advantage-based development charge was not time-barred and thus upheld the imposition.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Property Owners v. Municipality (Development Charges Limitation Period): The court determined that the limitation period for imposing such charges begins when the decision granting the construction permit becomes legally binding, and since the administrative act establishing the basis for the charge (the authorization) was finalized before the applicable statute of limitations expired, the claim for the advantage-based development charge was not time-barred and thus upheld the imposition.

Keywords

AI generated
limitation periods development charges statutory basis property development access to property building restriction easement Kausalabgaben (Vorteilsabgaben; Verjährung) | Kausalabgaben
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2024 42 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. August 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Thomas Twerenbold, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.A.________ und B.A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch … |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Tiefbauamt, Postfach 1251, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kausalabgaben (Vorteilsabgaben; Verjährung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: