Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II 2023 83 • VG SZ II 2023 83 AI generated

Unemployment Benefits Denial Due to Employer-like Position

Case Number II 2023 83
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellant sought unemployment insurance benefits after terminating their activity, claiming unemployment, but the insurer denied the claim because the appellant was deemed to hold an employer-like position ("arbeitgeberähnliche Stellung") and thus was not considered an insured unemployed person. The court reasoned that even though the appellant was not formally registered as a business owner, the continuous, dominant involvement in and financial control over the prior entity, coupled with the inability to secure comparable employment due to prior commitments, demonstrated an existing close connection to the enterprise such that the appellant could not be considered genuinely available for the labor market, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Unemployment Benefits Denial Due to Employer-like Position: The court reasoned that even though the appellant was not formally registered as a business owner, the continuous, dominant involvement in and financial control over the prior entity, coupled with the inability to secure comparable employment due to prior commitments, demonstrated an existing close connection to the enterprise such that the appellant could not be considered genuinely available for the labor market, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
unemployment insurance benefit unemployment insured business termination of employment dominant position gainfully employed persons
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 83 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. Dezember 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Anspruch auf Arbeitslosenent-schädigung; arbeitgeberähnliche Stellung) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: