Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II 2023 66 • VG SZ II 2023 66 AI generated

Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Suspension for Voluntary Resignation

Case Number II 2023 66
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

An appellant challenged a decision by the Office of Labor that suspended their entitlement to unemployment insurance benefits following a voluntary resignation from their prior employment without a valid reason. The court reasoned that the appellant failed to adequately demonstrate an urgent personal reason necessitating the immediate termination of the employment relationship, as required under the relevant insurance regulations for avoiding sanctions following voluntary job loss, and therefore upheld the administrative decision to suspend benefits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Suspension for Voluntary Resignation: The court reasoned that the appellant failed to adequately demonstrate an urgent personal reason necessitating the immediate termination of the employment relationship, as required under the relevant insurance regulations for avoiding sanctions following voluntary job loss, and therefore upheld the administrative decision to suspend benefits.

Keywords

AI generated
suspension of unemployment benefits voluntary resignation employment relationship entitlement to benefits unemployment right to disconnect
AI generated
II 2020 91
Appeal Against Unemployment Benefit Suspension Due to Self-Inflicted Unemployment
II 2021 89
Unemployment Insurance Benefit Eligibility Appeal
II 2025 38
Appeal Against Suspension of Unemployment Benefits for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2018 14
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2025 47
Claimant v. Employment Office: Unemployment Benefit Suspension Appeal

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 66 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. November 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung;