Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II 2023 2 • VG SZ II 2023 2 AI generated

Foreign Medical Treatment Reimbursement Dispute

Case Number II 2023 2
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date

Legislator summary

AI generated

A party challenged an administrative order regarding health insurance payments, where the core dispute centered on whether the costs for specific medical services incurred abroad should be covered under the mandatory basic health insurance scheme. The court reasoned that because the services obtained abroad were equivalent to treatments available within the national system, and the underlying legal requirement for cost coverage based on the principle of equal treatment was met, the insurer was obligated to reimburse the costs according to the domestic tariff schedule, even if the insured individual paid higher foreign rates.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Foreign Medical Treatment Reimbursement Dispute: The court reasoned that because the services obtained abroad were equivalent to treatments available within the national system, and the underlying legal requirement for cost coverage based on the principle of equal treatment was met, the insurer was obligated to reimburse the costs according to the domestic tariff schedule, even if the insured individual paid higher foreign rates.

Keywords

AI generated
principle of equal treatment reimbursement by health insurer mandatory health insurance foreign insurer tariff dispute medical treatment
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 2 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. April 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________ AG, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Krankenversicherung (Zahlungsverfügung vom 5. April 2022) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: