Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II 2023 18 • VG SZ II 2023 18 AI generated

Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Job Assignment

Case Number II 2023 18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellant challenged a decision that suspended their entitlement to unemployment benefits due to the refusal to accept a job assignment. The court reasoned that the lower authority correctly assessed the suitability of the offered employment and found that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the assignment was unreasonable or that their refusal was justified under the relevant provisions of the unemployment insurance law, thereby upholding the suspension of benefits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Job Assignment: The court reasoned that the lower authority correctly assessed the suitability of the offered employment and found that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the assignment was unreasonable or that their refusal was justified under the relevant provisions of the unemployment insurance law, thereby upholding the suspension of benefits.

Keywords

AI generated
suspension of unemployment benefits entitlement to benefits unemployment job offer breach of employment obligations prohibition of assignment
AI generated
II 2021 98
Unemployment Benefit Suspension Upheld for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2018 14
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2025 5
Unemployment Benefit Suspension Upheld for Failure to Apply for Assigned Job
II 2023 15
Unemployment Benefit Sanction Upheld for Refusal of Assigned Job
II 2021 59
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Non-Compliance with Job Application Instruction

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 18 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Mai 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung wegen Nichtannahme einer zugewiesenen Arbeit) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: