Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II 2022 77 • VG SZ II 2022 77 AI generated

Equalization Fund Reimbursement Denial Upheld for Lack of Evidentiary Proof of Loss

Case Number II 2022 77
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A company sought reimbursement under the COVID-19 loss of earnings compensation scheme, but the responsible equalization fund denied the claim because the company had not submitted the required documentation demonstrating the pandemic-related loss of income. The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the right to compensation is conditional upon the claimant providing the necessary evidentiary proof of the specific loss incurred due to the pandemic measures, which the company failed to furnish.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Equalization Fund Reimbursement Denial Upheld for Lack of Evidentiary Proof of Loss: The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the right to compensation is conditional upon the claimant providing the necessary evidentiary proof of the specific loss incurred due to the pandemic measures, which the company failed to furnish.

Keywords

AI generated
compensation for loss of earnings insurer reimbursement claim equalisation payment audit of the compensation fund non-recognized health insurance fund proof of solvency Erwerbsersatzordnung (Covid-19 Erwerbsersatz) | Erwerbsersatzordnung
AI generated
II 2022 64
Employer Reimbursement Denial for Lost Earnings Due to COVID-19 Measures Causation Dispute
II 2022 41
Claimant v. Compensation Fund: Denial of COVID-19 Earnings Replacement Benefits
II 2022 76
Cultural Corporation Appeal of Denied COVID-19 Loss Compensation
II 2020 59
Claimant v. Administrative Body (COVID-19 Loss of Earnings Appeal)
II 2021 109
Company Reimbursement Claim for COVID-19 Short-Time Work Allowance Upheld

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 77 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Januar 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ GmbH, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Erwerbsersatzordnung (Covid-19 Erwerbsersatz) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: