Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II 2022 69 • VG SZ II 2022 69 AI generated

Appeal on 2021 Premium Reduction Eligibility Based on Assessable Income

Case Number II 2022 69
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date

Legislator summary

AI generated

The case involved an appeal concerning the eligibility for premium reduction in 2021 based on assessable income. The appellants challenged the decision made by the equalization fund regarding their income assessment for the purpose of premium reduction. The court upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the calculation and determination of the assessable income, which formed the basis for denying the premium reduction, was legally sound and consistent with the relevant regulations governing social insurance entitlements.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 108 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal on 2021 Premium Reduction Eligibility Based on Assessable Income: The appellants challenged the decision made by the equalization fund regarding their income assessment for the purpose of premium reduction. The court upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the calculation and determination of the assessable income, which formed the basis for denying the premium reduction, was legally sound and consistent with the relevant regulations governing social insurance entitlements.

Keywords

AI generated
reduction of premiums income assessment insurance regulation entitlement condition for benefits preliminary decision in social insurance reduction of statutory salary increase Prämienverbilligung 2021 (anrechenbares Einkommen) | Prämienverbilligung

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 108 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG

The appeal is declared inadmissible because the decision subject to appeal is an interlocutory decision.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The court ordered the appellants to pay the court costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 69 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. Oktober 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ und B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Prämienverbilligung 2021 (anrechenbares Einkommen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: