Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II 2022 59 • VG SZ II 2022 59 AI generated

Pension Scheme Disability Rating Dispute

Case Number II 2022 59
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

A claimant appealed a decision regarding the calculation of their disability pension under a mandatory occupational pension scheme, specifically challenging the degree of disability (IV-Grad) used for the calculation. The court reasoned that the relevant disability degree must be determined based on the functional limitations affecting the claimant's capacity to perform the occupation covered by the insurance at the time the insured event occurred, adhering strictly to the assessment criteria defined in the relevant pension regulations and not solely relying on the general disability assessment from the social insurance authority.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Pension Scheme Disability Rating Dispute: The court reasoned that the relevant disability degree must be determined based on the functional limitations affecting the claimant's capacity to perform the occupation covered by the insurance at the time the insured event occurred, adhering strictly to the assessment criteria defined in the relevant pension regulations and not solely relying on the general disability assessment from the social insurance authority.

Keywords

AI generated
determination of disability pension pension scheme social insurance dispute assessment criteria mandatory occupational pension disability insurance
AI generated
II 2022 33
Pension Fund Over-Indemnification Calculation Dispute
I 2016 83
Pension Fund Disability Benefit Calculation Dispute
I 2024 52
Claimant v. Social Security Administration (Disability Pension Calculation)
I 2019 71
Claimant v. Social Insurance Institution: Disability Pension Appeal
I 2019 4
Disability Insurance Pension Assessment Appeal

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 59 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Urteil vom 14. Dezember 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Klägerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________, \n Beklagte, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Berufliche Vorsorge (Invalidenrente: Berechnung IV-Grad) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: