Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II 2022 5 • VG SZ II 2022 5 AI generated

Limited Liability Company Earnings Compensation Dispute

Case Number II 2022 5
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appeal concerned a dispute over entitlement to compensation under the earnings replacement scheme related to COVID-19, where the appellant, a limited liability company, challenged a decision by the compensation fund office. The court reasoned that since the appellant, as a limited liability company, was primarily organized around its managing director's personal labor, and the managing director was unable to perform this labor due to an officially ordered quarantine, the statutory requirements for receiving earnings compensation were met, thus leading to the confirmation of the entitlement.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Limited Liability Company Earnings Compensation Dispute: The court reasoned that since the appellant, as a limited liability company, was primarily organized around its managing director's personal labor, and the managing director was unable to perform this labor due to an officially ordered quarantine, the statutory requirements for receiving earnings compensation were met, thus leading to the confirmation of the entitlement.

Keywords

AI generated
limited liability company liability of managing director entitlement to compensation loss of earnings company in difficulties statutory requirement Erwerbsersatzordnung (Covid-19; Erwerbsersatz) | Erwerbsersatzordnung
AI generated
II 2022 71
Claimant v. Compensation Board: Loss of Earnings Compensation Entitlement During Quarantine-Related Staff Closure
II 2020 66
Loss of Earnings Compensation Appeal for Owner-Manager Classification
II 2020 59
Claimant v. Administrative Body (COVID-19 Loss of Earnings Appeal)
II 2021 70
Appeal Regarding Loss of Earnings Compensation Denial under Covid-19 Ordinance
II 2021 108
Claimant v. Earnings Replacement Scheme: Quarantine Order vs. Medical Certification

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 5 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Februar 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Milena Pesic, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, B.________ GmbH, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Erwerbsersatzordnung (Covid-19; Erwerbsersatz) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: