Claimant v. Insurance Provider Regarding Disability Benefits Denial
Legislator summary
AI generatedA claimant sought disability insurance benefits (a pension) following injuries sustained in a work-related traffic accident, where the initial decision and subsequent appeal both denied the claim, leading the claimant to contest the ruling regarding their degree of invalidity. The court upheld the previous decisions, reasoning that the medical evidence did not establish a degree of invalidity reaching the threshold required for the requested pension under the relevant insurance legislation, thus affirming the denial of benefits.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedClaimant v. Insurance Provider Regarding Disability Benefits Denial: The court upheld the previous decisions, reasoning that the medical evidence did not establish a degree of invalidity reaching the threshold required for the requested pension under the relevant insurance legislation, thus affirming the denial of benefits.
Keywords
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2022 20 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 5. August 2022 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Rente) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: