Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I 2022 14 • VG SZ I 2022 14 AI generated

Appeal of Denial of Disability Insurance Benefits

Case Number I 2022 14
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

An individual appealed a decision by the social insurance authority that denied further benefits under the disability insurance scheme, where the appellant claimed continued entitlement to benefits based on a sustained health impairment. The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the administrative review had established that the appellant was no longer incapable of working in a fraction of the former scope due to the existing medical condition, as the vocational rehabilitation measures had been concluded and the medical assessment indicated that further improvement was not expected, thus removing the basis for continued disability insurance payments.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal of Denial of Disability Insurance Benefits: The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the administrative review had established that the appellant was no longer incapable of working in a fraction of the former scope due to the existing medical condition, as the vocational rehabilitation measures had been concluded and the medical assessment indicated that further improvement was not expected, thus removing the basis for continued disability insurance payments.

Keywords

AI generated
disability benefit entitlement to insurance benefits vocational assessment improvement in health condition vocational rehabilitation assessment of disability Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) | Invalidenversicherung
AI generated
I 2019 83
Appeal of Denial of Disability Benefits
I 2017 108
Appeal of Denial of Disability Benefits
I 2023 49
Disability Insurance Benefit Denial Appeal
I 2023 46
Disability Benefits Appeal Denial Upheld
I 2019 54
Appeal of Denial of Disability Benefits Following Workplace Injury

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2022 14 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 5. August 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: