Accident Insurance Causation Appeal: Meniscus Injury
Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe case involves an appeal concerning accident insurance, specifically the causal link between an alleged accident and a subsequent meniscus injury, following a second appeal stage. The appellant sought to overturn a previous decision regarding the insurance claim. The court's reasoning, while not explicitly detailed in the provided excerpt, must address the evidentiary threshold required to establish that the workplace accident was the direct and proximate cause of the claimant's specific meniscus damage for the insurance benefit to be awarded.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedAccident Insurance Causation Appeal: Meniscus Injury: The appellant sought to overturn a previous decision regarding the insurance claim. The court's reasoning, while not explicitly detailed in the provided excerpt, must address the evidentiary threshold required to establish that the workplace accident was the direct and proximate cause of the claimant's specific meniscus damage for the insurance benefit to be awarded.
Keywords
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2022 1 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Juni 2023 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Dr.med. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Unfallkausalität; Meniskusschaden / 2. Rechtsgang im Verfahren I 2021 10) |\n
\n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: