Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I 2020 102 • VG SZ I 2020 102 AI generated

Invalidity Pension Claim Denial Based on Insufficient Medical Evidence of Impairment

Case Number I 2020 102
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellant sought an invalidity pension from the social insurance provider, who rejected the claim because the medical evidence did not substantiate a sustained, significant impairment of earning capacity resulting from a pre-existing condition. The court affirmed the rejection, reasoning that the medical assessment, particularly regarding the duration and severity of the health issue and its impact on work capacity, did not meet the legal threshold required for granting an invalidity pension under the relevant social insurance law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 65 Abs. 1 ATSG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 ATSG; Invalidity Pension Claim Denial Based on Insufficient Medical Evidence of Impairment: The court affirmed the rejection, reasoning that the medical assessment, particularly regarding the duration and severity of the health issue and its impact on work capacity, did not meet the legal threshold required for granting an invalidity pension under the relevant social insurance law.

Keywords

AI generated
invalidity pension assessment of work capacity health impairment medical reasons health insurance health claims Invalidenversicherung (Rente) | Invalidenversicherung

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 65 Abs. 1 ATSG

The appeal is partially granted and the decision of the IV authority is set aside to the extent that the claimant was not granted an initial assessment.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 ATSG

The respondent authority must bear the judicial costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2020 102 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Mai 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Tanja Marty, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Rente) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: