Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I 2018 91 • VG SZ I 2018 91 AI generated

Appeal of Administrative Claim Decision

Case Number I 2018 91
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The case involved a challenge against a prior administrative decision concerning a claim, where the appellant contested the determination made by the administrative body. The court, in reaching its verdict, focused on the interpretation and application of relevant legal provisions regarding the underlying claim, ultimately upholding the prior ruling based on the established facts and the correct legal standard applied by the lower authority.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal of Administrative Claim Decision: The court, in reaching its verdict, focused on the interpretation and application of relevant legal provisions regarding the underlying claim, ultimately upholding the prior ruling based on the established facts and the correct legal standard applied by the lower authority.

Keywords

AI generated
challenge of administrative decisions forfeiture of administrative claim action by staff standing to appeal reconsideration of an earlier decision administrative sanction Unfallversicherung (Rente und Integritätsentschädigung) | Unfallversicherung
AI generated
I 2021 15
Administrative Appeal Decision Review
BEK 2024 150
Appeal Regarding Judicial Authorization for Administrative Claim
III 2017 110
Appeal Against District Council Administrative Decision
ZK2 2024 51
Appeal of Estate Administration Decision
III 2018 49
Appealability of Administrative Act

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 91 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 10. April 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach 4358, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin Dr.iur. C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n