Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I 2018 14 • VG SZ I 2018 14 AI generated

Disability Insurance Daily Benefit Calculation Appeal Affirmed

Case Number I 2018 14
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

A claimant sought an appeal regarding the calculation basis for disability insurance (IV) daily benefits, specifically challenging the income used for the calculation. The court determined that the relevant facts supported the lower administrative decision regarding the calculation basis, affirming that the established income for determining the daily benefit, as per the relevant statutory provisions, was correctly applied by the administrative body despite the claimant's objections concerning the income level used.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 65 Abs. 2 lit. a BGG, Art. 93 Abs. 1 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Disability Insurance Daily Benefit Calculation Appeal Affirmed: The court determined that the relevant facts supported the lower administrative decision regarding the calculation basis, affirming that the established income for determining the daily benefit, as per the relevant statutory provisions, was correctly applied by the administrative body despite the claimant's objections concerning the income level used.

Keywords

AI generated
calculation of disability benefits insurance benefit basis of calculation entitlement condition for benefits statutory basis disability insurance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 65 Abs. 2 lit. a BGG

This provision was used to reject the appeal because the decision under review was not appealable on points of law.

Art. 93 Abs. 1 BGG

This provision was used to declare the appeal inadmissible as it was directed against an interlocutory decision.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

This provision was applied to order the appellant to pay the court costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 14 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 20. Juni 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Berechnungsgrundlage für IV-Taggeld) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: