Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I 2018 10 • VG SZ I 2018 10 AI generated

Appeal Against Cantonal Insurance Office and Compensation Fund Rulings

Case Number I 2018 10
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The case involves an appellant challenging decisions from two different bodies, the cantonal insurance office and a specific industry compensation fund. The core of the dispute centers on the appellant's status or entitlements as determined by these two administrative bodies, leading to two separate appeals against their respective prior rulings. The court rendered its decision on May 16, 2018, without the provided text detailing the specific facts of the dispute or the court's reasoning for its final verdict on the matter.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appeal Against Cantonal Insurance Office and Compensation Fund Rulings: The core of the dispute centers on the appellant's status or entitlements as determined by these two administrative bodies, leading to two separate appeals against their respective prior rulings. The court rendered its decision on May 16, 2018, without the provided text detailing the specific facts of the dispute or the court's reasoning for its final verdict on the matter.

Keywords

AI generated
insurance compensation matter in dispute change of insurance fund preliminary decision in social insurance subrogation of insurer action challenging schedule of claims Invalidenversicherung (Rentenaufhebung) | Invalidenversicherung
AI generated
II 2021 75
Cantonal Compensation Fund Decision Upheld in Insurance Appeal
I 2017 77
Appeal Against Cantonal Social Insurance Decision on Disability Benefits
III 2025 41
Appeal Against Cantonal Health Benefit Entitlement Decision Dismissed
II 2021 51
Cantonal Compensation Office Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
III 2019 220
Cantonal Building Decision Appeal

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 10 I 2018 11 |\n |\n \n|\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. Mai 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n Verfahren I 2018 10 \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Advokatin lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n Verfahren I 2018 11 \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Advokatin lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse der Uhrenindustrie, Mühlestrasse 14, \n Postfach 141, 2540 Grenchen, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n