Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I 2017 8 • VG SZ I 2017 8 AI generated

Disability Insurance Appeal Reaffirming Existing Medical Evaluation

Case Number I 2017 8
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date

Legislator summary

AI generated

The claimant appealed a decision regarding disability insurance, challenging the required medical evaluation, after an earlier application for benefits was denied based on existing medical evidence. The court reasoned that since the claimant had not presented any new medical findings or pointed out specific factual errors in the previous expert opinions, the lower court was justified in upholding the existing determination that the claimant had not demonstrated a significant change in their medical condition warranting a reassessment of disability status.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Disability Insurance Appeal Reaffirming Existing Medical Evaluation: The court reasoned that since the claimant had not presented any new medical findings or pointed out specific factual errors in the previous expert opinions, the lower court was justified in upholding the existing determination that the claimant had not demonstrated a significant change in their medical condition warranting a reassessment of disability status.

Keywords

AI generated
disability insurance benefit medical reassessment medical evidence expert opinion health impairment in military insurance reinstatement of insured status Invalidenversicherung (Begutachtung) | Invalidenversicherung
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 8 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. Mai 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________ \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. Daniel Candrian, \n Weidhuobli 29, 6430 Schwyz, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Begutachtung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: