Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I 2017 13 • VG SZ I 2017 13 AI generated

Accident Insurance Daily Sickness Benefit Calculation Dispute

Case Number I 2017 13
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The case concerned a dispute over daily sickness benefits under accident insurance, where the insured party appealed a prior decision. The core issue revolved around the proper calculation or entitlement to these benefits following an accident. The court's reasoning, though the full reasoning is not detailed, addressed the specific facts of the claim within the context of accident insurance law to reach its judgment on the validity of the prior ruling regarding the daily allowances.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Accident Insurance Daily Sickness Benefit Calculation Dispute: The core issue revolved around the proper calculation or entitlement to these benefits following an accident. The court's reasoning, though the full reasoning is not detailed, addressed the specific facts of the claim within the context of accident insurance law to reach its judgment on the validity of the prior ruling regarding the daily allowances.

Keywords

AI generated
accident insurance benefit daily sickness benefit insurance calculation of benefit over-insurance entitlement to benefits social insurance dispute Unfallversicherung (Taggeldleistungen) | Unfallversicherung
AI generated
I 2022 25
Claimant v. Insurer Regarding Sickness Benefit Calculation Including Variable Compensation
I 2019 80
Dispute Over Sickness Daily Benefits
I 2021 3
Accident Insurance Benefits Causality Dispute
I 2018 109
Accident Insurance Benefits Causation Dispute
I 2021 31
Accident Insurance Benefits Causation Dispute

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 13 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. Juli 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Stefan Getzmann, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Markus Sigg, \n Industriestrasse 5a, Postfach 123, 6210 Sursee, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________ AG, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Taggeldleistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: