Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I 2016 33 • VG SZ I 2016 33 AI generated

Appellant Seeks Reimbursement for Home Care Exceeding Statutory Benefits

Case Number I 2016 33
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Decision Date
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

An appellant sought reimbursement for home care contributions following an accident, appealing a decision that denied the claim. The court reasoned that the appellant had not sufficiently demonstrated that the necessary care exceeded the scope covered by the standard statutory benefits, particularly regarding the extent and continuity of the required assistance, thereby upholding the previous ruling.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Appellant Seeks Reimbursement for Home Care Exceeding Statutory Benefits: The court reasoned that the appellant had not sufficiently demonstrated that the necessary care exceeded the scope covered by the standard statutory benefits, particularly regarding the extent and continuity of the required assistance, thereby upholding the previous ruling.

Keywords

AI generated
statutory benefit claim for contributions home care services insurer reimbursement claim compensation for bodily injuries reimbursement of social assistance Unfallversicherung (Hauspflegebeitrag) | Unfallversicherung
AI generated
II 2018 37
Recipient Appeal on Supplementary Benefit Coverage for Hospital and Home Care Costs
I 2018 82
Claimant v. Social Insurance Office: Care Allowance Supplement for Home Care
ZK1 2021 25
Appeal Dismissed for Insufficient Substantiation of Reimbursement Claim
I 2019 74
Accident Insurance: Coverage for Non-Medical Basic Care and Direct Service Provision Principle
II 2022 48
Maintenance Arrears Offset Against Supplementary Benefits

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2016 33 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Juli 2016 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach 4358, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Hauspflegebeitrag) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: